It’s that time again with Pinkdot around the corner…

(1) Gay marriages have no legal definition of adultery or consummation which makes monogamy impossible to legally enforce and therefore destroys the monogamous character of the marriage institution.

(2) To criminalise homosexual acts or forbid gay marriages is not “discriminatory” for as our Attorney General has argued, both straights and gays or anyone regardless of sexual orientation, would be liable to be charged under 377A. Thus “gay for pay”, straight guys who perform homosexual acts, would be as liable to be charged under 377A as gays, there is no discrimination here and the law is equally applicable to everyone regardless of sexual orientation. The same logic applies to marriages, everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, has the right to contract a marriage with the opposite sex, and everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, does not have the right to contract a marriage with the same sex. The law is equally applicable to all without discrimination.